But Why Didn’t Goldstone Know Then What He Knew Then?
Richard Goldstone’s public “reconsideration” of the Goldstone Report, in which he seems to withdraw his endorsement of the report’s most inflammatory conclusions, is certainly significant.
He wrote in the Washington Post:
We know a lot more today about what happened in the Gaza war of 2008-09 than we did when I chaired the fact-finding mission appointed by the U.N. Human Rights Council that produced what has come to be known as the Goldstone Report. If I had known then what I know now, the Goldstone Report would have been a different document.
While that’s a dramatic and notable admission, the question remains: Why didn’t he know then what was known then?
More from SNAPSHOTS
AFP Falsely Reports: Hamas Accepts State ‘Limited to 1967 Borders’
June 14, 2017
Influential wire service Agence France Presse falsely reported yesterday that Hamas' May 1 policy document accepts a Palestinian state "limited to the 1967 borders" ("Gaza: Palestinian territory ravaged by war, poverty"). In no way does [...]
Award-Winning Swedish Journalist Carries Out Terrorist Attack
June 12, 2017
Notre Dame Cathedral The perpetrator responsible for carrying out a June 6, 2017 terrorist attack at the Notre Dame cathedral in Paris was an “award-winning journalist” who previously worked as a freelancer for Swedish public [...]
USA Today Coverage of 1967 War Blurs Important Truths
June 7, 2017
USA Today’s “50 years after Six-Day War, Israel-Palestinian borders are still fuzzy” (June 5, 2017) omitted important information about the “occupation” of territories seized by Israel during the 1967 war and the anti-Jewish violence that [...]