Where’s the Coverage? NY Times Correction Undermines Anti-Netanyahu Narrative Promoted by… NY Times

By Published On: February 11, 2015

question-mark1.jpg

The Tower Magazine reported:

A correction published in The New York Times on Friday shows that a key report was mistaken in earlier reporting on Israeli Prime Minister’s Benjamin Netanyahu’s acceptance of House Speaker John Boehner’s (R – Ohio) invitation to address a joint session of Congress in March. This, despite the fact that Boehner’s office released a detailed timeline two days earlier. The report played a central role in the widespread controversy that ensued about the propriety of Netanyahu’s acceptance of the invitation.

The original article reported that Netanyahu had explained why he accepted the invitation from Boehner “without first notifying the White House.”

The correction states that the White House had indeed been informed prior to Netanyahu’s acceptance.

Indeed, here is the correction in The Times:

Correction: January 30, 2015
An earlier version of this article misstated when Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel accepted Speaker John A. Boehner’s invitation to address Congress. He accepted after the administration had been informed of the invitation, not before.

American Thinker notes that the protocol followed in arranging Netanyahu’s speech this year is no different than protocol followed in 2011:

In 2011, Boehner sent a notice to the WH stating his intention to invite Netanyahu to speak before a joint session of Congress. The White House never responded (spite? incompetence?) and Boehner proceeded to extend the invitation to Netanyahu. Netanyahu accepted the invitation and spoke. The White House did not express any outrage in 2011.

[…]

Boehner clearly assumed the same series of events was occurring when the White House failed to respond this time to the notice given to the White House before he sent an invite to Netanyahu. (Hat Tip: CJL and LR).

However, the correction, and the fact that it completely undermines “speechgate,” has only been reported in some blogs, Jewish, Israeli or niche media.

Indeed, even after the correction, Times columnist Thomas Friedman continued to flog the false narrative.

Where are the journalistic ethics? Where’s the fact-based reporting? And, at the very least, when it comes to the correction of the record on the issue of Netanyahu’s upcoming speech… Where’s the coverage?

We expose the anti-Israel lies so you don't have to. But we can't do it without your help. Join the fight -- Donate now
Tell the World – Share Now!

More from SNAPSHOTS

  • Israel-E.U. Economic Ties Increase

    February 20, 2018

    Economic ties between the nation of Israel and the European Union (EU) have increased, according to the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP), a Washington D.C.-based think tank. Ilysa Tuttelman, a researcher for WINEP’s [...]

  • The Media Ignores Foiled Plot to Assassinate Israel’s Defense Minister

    February 20, 2018

    Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman Israeli authorities foiled a plot to assassinate Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman, the Shin Bet security service said on Feb. 18, 2018. The Shin Bet’s remarks went widely underreported by major [...]

  • The Song Remains The Same: NYT Backs Off the Palestinian Authority

    February 16, 2018

    Earlier this week, in a moment of candor, the New York Times acknowledged that the Palestinian Authority does, in fact, have agency in shaping the situation in the Israel and the territories. A Feb. 12 [...]

  • Huffington Post Arabic, Platform for Hamas Propaganda

    February 12, 2018

    Feb. 20 Update: Huffington Post Arabic Removes Hamas Propaganda Hamas has found an unlikely platform to amplify its propaganda. Huffington Post Arabic has copied and pasted a Hamas caption, word for word, including language completely [...]

  • UPDATED:The Washington Post Claims Israel Used Iranian Drone As ‘Pretext’ For Attack

    February 10, 2018

    The remnants of the Iranian UAV. Picture courtesy of The Times of Israel The Washington Post treated an Iranian attack against Israel with unwarranted skepticism, using the event to unfairly question the motives of the [...]

  • NY Times: “Hard-Line” Jews Support Recognition of Jerusalem as Capital

    February 8, 2018

    A New York Times news story about this morning's National Prayer Breakfast broad-brushes American Jews who back recognition of Israel's capital in Jerusalem as hard-liners. In the article, White House correspondent Mark Lander asserts: Mr. [...]

  • Los Angeles Times Errs on Commercial Imports to Gaza

    February 8, 2018

    Flat screen television sets at Kerem Shalom crossing on their way to Gaza from Israel, 2012 (photo by Adam Levick) In their Los Angeles Times article yesterday ("Neither Israel nor Hamas wants another war in [...]

  • New York Times, and the Continuous Mischaracterization of BDS

    February 2, 2018

    So maybe the image above is a bit of an overstatement. But for some reason, the New York Times can't seem to get it right when explaining BDS activism to readers. BDS stands for boycott, [...]

  • ‘Moderate’ Palestinian ‘Peace Negotiator’ Outraged Over U.S. Designation of Hamas Terrorist

    February 1, 2018

    Ismail Haniyeh On Jan. 31, 2018 the United States State Department announced that top Hamas operative Ismail Haniyeh was now listed as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT). Less than twenty-four hours later, the Palestinian [...]

  • Echoes of the Past: German Tanks and the Turkish Government Assaulting Minorities

    January 31, 2018

    An article in the German newspaper Deutsche Welle reports on the consternation of members of the German government over the use of German Leopard tanks by the Turkish army in its cross-border invasion of the [...]