CNN Muddles Through Peace Talks

By Published On: July 26, 2013

CNN International logo.gif

As diplomats, negotiators and media gear up for the next round of Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, CNN International demonstrates that it needs to brush up with a crash course on Mideast history. The July 21 article by Jason Hanna, Joe Sterling and Michael Martinez, “Israelis, Palestinians react to agreement on resuming peace talks,” bungles a basic historical point, stating that Israel:

annexed East Jerusalem from the Palestinian territories, uniting the historic city to make it the capital of the Jewish state.

In fact, Israel was annexed from Jordan, not the Palestinian territories. (This basic fact was correctly reported by CNN in 2010.) Nor should east Jerusalem be labeled as part of today’s Palestinian territories given that the status of that part of the city is disputed and is slated to be resolved in negotiations.

An earlier version of this article, still available through Internet archives, erroneously referred to Tel Aviv as the capital of Israel. The error has been removed, and a screenshot as it initially appeared follows:

CNN.com Tel Aviv.jpg

The corrected text reads:

It would be in line with a decades-old United Nations resolution calling on Israel to release territories it gained during a war, a demand that Israel has historically fought.

If CNN can’t be relied on to correctly identify Israel’s capital, and to accurately report that eastern Jerusalem was annexed from Jordan, and not “Palestinian territories,” it’s no wonder that the media outlet bungles more complex issues.

Indeed, the article repeatedly refers to the “Green Line” as “pre-1967 borders.” This is a highly distorted and misleading characterization. President Obama raised the 1967 parameter in a May 19, 2011 policy speech in which he correctly referred to the “1967 lines.”

As CAMERA has noted:

The Green Line, to which the president was referring, served as an armistice demarcation line between Israel and Jordan. The armistice line was established April 3, 1949 by Article III of the Israel-Jordan Armistice Agreement and was never the “border” between Israel and the West Bank.

On the contrary, the agreement specifically notes that the lines are not borders: “The Armistice Demarcation Lines defined in articles V and VI of this Agreement are agreed upon by the Parties without prejudice to future territorial settlements or boundary lines or to claims of either Party relating thereto.”

In short, the word “border” implies legality, political significance and permanence that does not apply in this circumstance.

Lord Caradon, the British representative to the United Nations during the 1967 Six-Day War, made this very point when discussing U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, which calls for a peace agreement based on territorial concessions and recognition of countries’ right to exist in peace and security. Explaining the meaning behind Resolution 242, which he drafted, he noted that

It would have been wrong to demand that Israel return to its positions of 4 June 1967 because those positions were undesirable and artificial. After all, they were just the places the soldiers of each side happened to be the day the fighting stopped in 1948. They were just armistice lines. That’s why we didn’t demand that the Israelis return to them and I think we were right not to …

CNN apparently confuses that very point when in a separate article, also July 21, it implies that Resolution 242 called on Israel to withdraw “completely” from territories it won in the 1967 war:

Reuters news agency quoted an Israeli official last week who said Israel agreed to a plan for peace talks based on pre-1967 borders and land swaps.

It is something the United Nations demanded in a resolution in 1967 and has been the gold standard of yearnings for Middle East peace ever since. It requires Israel to withdraw from occupied territories completely and the Palestinians to recognize the existence of an Israeli state.

But as Lord Caradon stated, and as the New York Times corrected three times in the summer of 2000, Resolution 242 does not require Israel to withdraw “completely” from occupied territories, but calls from withdrawal from an unspecified amount of territory. Nor does the current reported plan call for “complete” withdrawal from disputed territories. As CNN itself notes in the previous paragraph, Secretary of State John Kerry’s plan allows for land swaps.

Aug. 8 Update: CAMERA Prompts CNN Correction on Jerusalem

We expose the anti-Israel lies so you don't have to. But we can't do it without your help. Join the fight -- Donate now
Tell the World – Share Now!

More from SNAPSHOTS

  • Los Angeles Times Errs on Argentina Cancellation

    June 18, 2018

    A June 15 Los Angeles Times sports article (online here, "Lionel Messi needs a World Cup while Iceland is just happy to be playing in one"), Kevin Baxter errs about the Argentinian team's cancellation of [...]

  • CNN’s Ben Wedeman Falsely Reports No Soldiers Injured in Gaza Border Violence

    June 17, 2018

    In a June 7 broadcast and online here, Ben Wedeman incorrectly reported that in the course of the ongoing "March of Return" violence at the Gaza border, "No Israeli soldiers were killed or injured during [...]

  • Where’s the Coverage? Hezbollah Helps Hamas Build Terror Camps, Israel Calls for U.N. Help

    June 12, 2018

    Well equipped Hamas operatives Hezbollah, the Lebanese-based, Iranian-backed terrorist group is helping Hamas build rocket factories and terror training camps in southern Lebanon, according to a Jerusalem Post report. Hezbollah’s assistance violates several United Nations [...]

  • AFP Captions Whitewash Berlin Al Quds Rally

    June 12, 2018

    According to The Jerusalem Post ("Heavy Turnout at Al-Quds Rally in Berlin Calls for Israel's Destruction"), participants at the June 9 anti-Israel Al Quds march in Berlin chanted "Zionists are the perpetrators" and "Zionists anywhere, [...]

  • Palestinian Fire Kites Are No Child’s Play

    June 7, 2018

    Palestinians set Israeli fields ablaze with fire kitesMuch of the media has been either ignoring or minimizing the incendiary kites launched by Palestinians into Israeli territory. The New York Times, for example, describes them as [...]

  • Where’s the Coverage? Israel Foils Assassination Plot Targeting Netanyahu and Others

    June 6, 2018

    Israeli authorities uncovered and thwarted a terrorist cell that planned to murder top governmental officials, including the country’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and the mayor of Jerusalem, Nir Barkat. However, many major U.S. news outlets [...]

  • U.S. Official: Iran’s Support for Hezbollah Greater Than Previously Thought

    June 6, 2018

    Hezbollah head Hassan Nasrallah The Islamic Republic of Iran’s support for Hezbollah might be greater than previously thought. Tehran gives the Lebanese-based terrorist group $700 million a year, according to recent remarks by the U.S. [...]

  • Where’s the Coverage? 14 Members of Congress Call to Halt PA Aid

    June 1, 2018

    U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo In a widely underreported move, fourteen members of the United States Congress called upon the U.S. State Department to “immediately suspend all aid payments to the Palestinian Authority.” The [...]

  • Some Real Self-Criticism at CATC

    May 30, 2018

  • Michael Brown Exposes Double-Standard at Christ at the Checkpoint

    May 30, 2018

    Michael Brown speaks at the Christ at the Checkpoint Conference on May 29, 2018. (Photo: Dexter Van Zile) Every two years, the ritual is repeated. The organizers of the Christ at the Checkpoint Conference, a [...]