Despite Assurances by NYT and Guardian, Hamas Still Rejects Israel

By Published On: April 20, 2012

hamas-pix-for-gabi.jpeg

In his interview with The Forward, senior Hamas leader Mousa Abu Marzook explained that his organization would not honor a peace treaty signed by Israel and the Palestinian Authority, and reiterated, yet again, the group’s rejection of Israel:

Any agreement reached between Israel and the Palestinian Authority will be subject to far-reaching changes if Hamas comes to power in a democratic Palestinian state, a top Hamas leader told The Forward in an exclusive and wide-ranging interview.

Mousa Abu Marzook, considered Hamas’s second-highest-ranking official, said that his group would view an agreement between Israel and the P.A. — even one ratified by a referendum of all Palestinians — as a hudna, or cease-fire, rather than as a peace treaty. In power, he said, Hamas would feel free to shift away from those provisions of the agreement that define it as a peace treaty and move instead toward a relationship of armed truce.

“We will not recognize Israel as a state,” he said emphatically. “It will be like the relationship between Lebanon and Israel or Syria and Israel.”

Wait… but what about this?

And what about this?

guardian hamas headline.jpg

And this?

guardian hamas headline b.jpg

Those headlines were unprofessional and just plain wrong at the time, and still are today.

Here are just a few of the historical Hamas statements that dovetail with Marzook’s latest comments:

• Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh explained in December 2010, “We said it five years ago and we say it now … we will never, we will never, we will never recognize Israel.”

In a December 2010 statement, the group noted, “We say that Palestine from the sea to the (Jordan) river is fully the land of the Palestinians. We will cede none of it, and we will not recognise the so-called state of Israel.”

• Hamas leader Mahmoud al-Zahar said in November 2010 that the Jews “have no place among us…and no future among the nations.” Where are the Jews to go? Al-Zahar predicts: “You are about to disappear, and we are about to emerge victorious.”

• Zahar also said in June 2010, “Our plan for this stage is to liberate any inch of Palestinian land, and to establish a state on it. Our ultimate plan is [to have] Palestine in its entirety. I say this loud and clear so that nobody will accuse me of employing political tactics. We will not recognize the Israeli enemy.”

• A November 2007 Hamas statement asserted, “It is not shameful to correct a mistake. Palestine is Arab-Islamic land from the river to the sea, including Jerusalem, and Jews have no place there”

• Khaled Meshal in December 2006 called Israel a “cancer that must be pulled out by its roots.”

We expose the anti-Israel lies so you don't have to. But we can't do it without your help. Join the fight -- Donate now
Tell the World – Share Now!

More from SNAPSHOTS

  • Reuters Falsely Links Jerusalem Embassy, Two-State Solution

    January 9, 2019

    The Jerusalem office park which houses Guatemala's embassy Multiple recent Reuters articles incorrectly report that moving the Brazilian embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem is a dramatic move away from the two-state solution. For instance, [...]

  • American Lutheran In Jerusalem Affirms that IDF Soldiers Are “Stormtroopers,” Backtracks

    December 19, 2018

    Rev. Carrie Ballenger Smith is a pastor at the Church of the Redeemer in Jerusalem. She ministers to the English-speaking congregation that meets at the Lutheran church, which is located in the Old City of [...]

  • LA Times, Places Not Banned, and Inaccurate Terminology

    December 11, 2018

    Not on Trump's travel ban list: Egypt, Afghanistan, 'Palestine' At least eight times in the last 14 years, The Los Angeles Times has corrected the inaccurate use of the term "Palestine," but that fact did [...]

  • The Washington Post Ignores Antisemitic Attack in Los Angeles

    November 29, 2018

    The Washington Post has warned about a “rising tide of antisemitism.” But as CAMERA has highlighted, The Post’s coverage of antisemitism has frequently been selective and is often politicized. More recently, the newspaper even ignored [...]

  • Think Tank: Iran Was Closer to Building a Bomb Than Previously Thought

    November 23, 2018

    A Nov. 20, 2018 report by a Washington D.C.-based think tank, the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) argues that Iran’s illegal nuclear weapons program was “more advanced than Western intelligence agencies and the [...]

  • AFP Headline Casts Palestinian Assailant as Victim

    November 21, 2018

    Agence France Presse yesterday published a throwback headline, bringing us back to the period almost two years ago in which media outlets serially produced headlines which depicted Palestinian attackers as the victims. The wire agency's [...]

  • Founder of Women’s March Distances Herself from Linda Sarsour and Other Haters

    November 20, 2018

    Teresa Shook, founder of the Women's March, has asked Linda Sarsour and other haters to step down as co-chairs of the movement. In her

  • More Hypocrisy and Anti-Semitism From Linda Sarsour

    November 19, 2018

    In an earlier CAMERA exposé, we pointed out the self-serving allegiances and disgraceful hypocrisy of Linda Sarsour (of Women's March fame). We demonstrated how she poses as a universal activist who embraces all marginalized people [...]

  • New Yorker‘s Ostensible Accuracy on Gaza Fisherman

    November 19, 2018

    Nov. 20 Update: New Yorker Corrects on Gaza Fisherman's Death After severely tripping up in its Gaza coverage earlier this year, The New Yorker -- a publication ostensibly "known for its high standards" in fact-checking [...]

  • Small Steps: Improved NY Times Language on Target of Hamas Rockets

    November 15, 2018

    Earlier this week, we pointed out how a New York Times article about fighting between Israel and Hamas neglected to inform readers that Palestinian rockets were fired indiscriminately toward civilians in Israeli towns and cities. [...]