But Why Didn’t Goldstone Know Then What He Knew Then?
Richard Goldstone’s public “reconsideration” of the Goldstone Report, in which he seems to withdraw his endorsement of the report’s most inflammatory conclusions, is certainly significant.
He wrote in the Washington Post:
We know a lot more today about what happened in the Gaza war of 2008-09 than we did when I chaired the fact-finding mission appointed by the U.N. Human Rights Council that produced what has come to be known as the Goldstone Report. If I had known then what I know now, the Goldstone Report would have been a different document.
While that’s a dramatic and notable admission, the question remains: Why didn’t he know then what was known then?
More from SNAPSHOTS
Where’s the Coverage? Israel Offered to Help Iranian and Iraqi Earthquake Victims
November 17, 2017
An Israeli offer to assist Iranian and Iraqi earthquake victims was “immediately rebutted” by Baghdad and Tehran—and widely ignored by major U.S. news outlets. As The Times of Israel reported on Nov. 14, 2017, Israeli [...]
Tucker Carlson Allows Max Blumenthal’s Anti-Israel Comments to Slide
November 16, 2017
This past Tuesday, on his Fox News television show Tucker Carlson Tonight, host Tucker Carlson interviewed Max Blumenthal about the Russian government-funded cable network RT and the Trump administration’s attempt to have that station register [...]
Anti-Israel NGO Admits: Palestinian Children Commit Terror for ‘Status’
November 14, 2017
A PFLP operative The program director for Defence for Children International-Palestine (DCI-P), a Palestinian NGO, admitted in an interview that Palestinian minors commit terror attacks to enhance their societal status. The admission contradicts DCI-P’s propaganda, [...]
Palestinian Authority Admits to Supporting BDS—Violating Oslo
October 27, 2017
PA President Mahmoud Abbas A top Palestinian Authority (PA) official has acknowledged that the authority supports the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement. BDS unfairly maligns the Jewish state and denies its existence any legitimacy. [...]