Washington Post Confuses Gaza with N. Ireland

By Published On: October 7, 2009

The Washington Post’s October 7 lead “The World” pages article “What to Do With Hamas? Question Snarls Peace Bid; Islamist Group’s Resilience and Obstinacy Frustrate Many” was informative enough to make the Daily Alert news summary distributed by the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations. But two flaws weakened the report by The Post’s Jerusalem Bureau Chief, Howard Schneider.

The Post notes that Hamas (the Palestinian Islamic Resistance Movement) is “unlikely” to accept international conditions for inclusion in negotiations, including renunciation of violence, adherence to previous Israeli-Palestinian agreements and recognition of Israel. But U.S. envoy George “Mitchell faced a similar dilemma during the Northern Ireland peace process, when there was opposition to inclusion of the Irish Republican Army in the talks ….” The analogy fails: the IRA wanted to “liberate” Northern Ireland from the United Kingdom; destroying England and the English people was not its raison d’etre. Hamas’ reason for being is to destroy Israel and slaughter the Jewish people; a Gaza Strip and West Bank “Palestine” is only a stepping stone. Since the article cites Hamas and its representatives to this effect, why suggest the Northern Ireland/IRA case is “similar”?

The Post uncritically transcribes the Hamas narrative, writing that “just as the ‘peace culture’ that followed the signing of the Oslo accords in the early 1990s gave way to an intifada, or uprising in 2000, Hamas officials say the current upbeat mood in the West Bank will at some point erode — leaving groups that support armed action in favor.” The “peace culture” or brief euphoria that followed the 1993 Israeli-Palestine Liberation Organization Declaration of Principles was destroyed by “armed action” — terrorist attacks on buses, restaurants, shopping malls and other civilian targets — launched in 1994 by Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and PLO-related groups. As many Israelis were murdered by Palestinian terrorists from 1993 to 1998 as were killed in the 15 years before Oslo.

The 2000 intifada, on the other hand, was the Palestinian leadership’s violent rejection of that year’s Israeli-U.S. offer of a West Bank, Gaza Strip and eastern Jerusalem country in exchange for peace with Israel as a Jewish state.

“What to Do With Hamas? Question Snarls Peace Bid” highlights some key obstacles to Israeli-Palestinian diplomacy. But it clouds one and trips over another.

We expose the anti-Israel lies so you don't have to. But we can't do it without your help. Join the fight -- Donate now
Tell the World – Share Now!

More from SNAPSHOTS

  • Reuters Falsely Links Jerusalem Embassy, Two-State Solution

    January 9, 2019

    The Jerusalem office park which houses Guatemala's embassy Multiple recent Reuters articles incorrectly report that moving the Brazilian embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem is a dramatic move away from the two-state solution. For instance, [...]

  • American Lutheran In Jerusalem Affirms that IDF Soldiers Are “Stormtroopers,” Backtracks

    December 19, 2018

    Rev. Carrie Ballenger Smith is a pastor at the Church of the Redeemer in Jerusalem. She ministers to the English-speaking congregation that meets at the Lutheran church, which is located in the Old City of [...]

  • LA Times, Places Not Banned, and Inaccurate Terminology

    December 11, 2018

    Not on Trump's travel ban list: Egypt, Afghanistan, 'Palestine' At least eight times in the last 14 years, The Los Angeles Times has corrected the inaccurate use of the term "Palestine," but that fact did [...]

  • The Washington Post Ignores Antisemitic Attack in Los Angeles

    November 29, 2018

    The Washington Post has warned about a “rising tide of antisemitism.” But as CAMERA has highlighted, The Post’s coverage of antisemitism has frequently been selective and is often politicized. More recently, the newspaper even ignored [...]

  • Think Tank: Iran Was Closer to Building a Bomb Than Previously Thought

    November 23, 2018

    A Nov. 20, 2018 report by a Washington D.C.-based think tank, the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) argues that Iran’s illegal nuclear weapons program was “more advanced than Western intelligence agencies and the [...]

  • AFP Headline Casts Palestinian Assailant as Victim

    November 21, 2018

    Agence France Presse yesterday published a throwback headline, bringing us back to the period almost two years ago in which media outlets serially produced headlines which depicted Palestinian attackers as the victims. The wire agency's [...]

  • Founder of Women’s March Distances Herself from Linda Sarsour and Other Haters

    November 20, 2018

    Teresa Shook, founder of the Women's March, has asked Linda Sarsour and other haters to step down as co-chairs of the movement. In her

  • More Hypocrisy and Anti-Semitism From Linda Sarsour

    November 19, 2018

    In an earlier CAMERA exposé, we pointed out the self-serving allegiances and disgraceful hypocrisy of Linda Sarsour (of Women's March fame). We demonstrated how she poses as a universal activist who embraces all marginalized people [...]

  • New Yorker‘s Ostensible Accuracy on Gaza Fisherman

    November 19, 2018

    Nov. 20 Update: New Yorker Corrects on Gaza Fisherman's Death After severely tripping up in its Gaza coverage earlier this year, The New Yorker -- a publication ostensibly "known for its high standards" in fact-checking [...]

  • Small Steps: Improved NY Times Language on Target of Hamas Rockets

    November 15, 2018

    Earlier this week, we pointed out how a New York Times article about fighting between Israel and Hamas neglected to inform readers that Palestinian rockets were fired indiscriminately toward civilians in Israeli towns and cities. [...]