Double Standards: Boycotts and Discrimination in MassLive
Anti-Israel activists, including Harvard University’s Lara Jirmanus, a clinical instructor, seem to struggle with the concept of “discrimination.” Quoted in a May 14 MassLive article, “Harvard ‘failed to respond’ to 450 discrimination complaints. Staff hand-delivered them again,” Jirmanus complains that Harvard has taken “utterly discriminatory” actions against Arab, Muslim, and Palestinian people, including by “eliminating the[ir] speech.”
How so? The article’s author, Juliet Schulman-Hall, cites as an example: “Harvard School of Public Health cut ties with Birzeit University in the West Bank amid repeated claims that the university was tied to Hamas…”
Consider the irony.
Jirmanus is a known supporter of the anti-Israel academic boycott movement. She is a member of Harvard’s Faculty and Staff for Justice in Palestine, which “endorse[s] the 2005 call issued by Palestinian civil society for Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions” against Israel and declares it is “focused on boycotts of Israeli academic institutions…”
In fact, Jirmanus so fervently supports the anti-Israel boycott movement that she has pledged to boycott even those universities which are insufficiently anti-Israel. In an April 2024 statement, Jirmanus pledged to boycott Columbia University and Barnard College over the arrest of anti-Israel students who occupied and vandalized university property and even held staff members hostage.
Notice the fundamental distinction between Harvard’s decision to cut ties with Birzeit University and the Jirmanus-endorsed anti-Israel academic boycott movement. Birzeit University was individually selected because it is a Hamas stronghold. For example, as CAMERA has previously pointed out, Birzeit University is actively providing material support to the internationally designated terrorist organization.
On the other hand, the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic & Cultural Boycott of Israel targets academic institutions by virtue of their being Israeli, i.e., based entirely on their national identity.
What is more offensive and “utterly discriminatory”: boycotting a specific institution because of its harboring of and material support for a terrorist organization, or boycotting an entire category of institutions on the basis of their national identity?
The obvious answer, it seems, evades Jirmanus.
More from SNAPSHOTS
Mahmoud Abbas’ Diatribe Threatening Israel Included Bogus Canaanite Claim
September 10, 2019
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas’ recent anti-Israel diatribe that aired on PA TV was monitored and translated by Palestinian Media Watch (PMW). Excerpt: "I say to [Israel]: Every stone you have built on our land [...]
CNN Calls House’s Unifying Anti-BDS Vote ‘Divisive’
July 24, 2019
Yesterday, in an overwhelming vote of bipartisan support, the House of Representatives voted 398 to 17 to adopt a resolution opposing the anti-Israel BDS (boycott, divest, sanctions) campaign. Yet, CNN's headline casts the unifying vote [...]
NY Times Cites Poll, Hides Palestinian Support for Violence
July 9, 2019
The New York Times has struggled to accurately describe polls this year. In January, editor Jonathan Weisman misrepresented Pew polling data to describe a nonexistent surge in Israeli support for the United States under President [...]
CNN’s Zakaria Indulges Palestinian Propagandist Hanan Ashrawi
June 9, 2019
Fareed Zakaria’s weekly Cable News Network (CNN) program (grandiosely named “Global Public Square”) June 9 broadcast included a discussion of the current U.S. Middle East peace plan with guests Hanan Ashrawi (Palestinian Authority official) and [...]
In Robert Bernstein Obit, AFP Inappropriately References His Judaism
May 29, 2019
Robert Bernstein (Courtesy the New Press) In its obituary yesterday for American publisher Robert Bernstein, Agence France Presse inserted an inappropriate reference to the Human Rights Watch founder who later turned on the organization due [...]