Where’s the Coverage? NY Times Correction Undermines Anti-Netanyahu Narrative Promoted by… NY Times

By Published On: February 11, 2015

question-mark1.jpg

The Tower Magazine reported:

A correction published in The New York Times on Friday shows that a key report was mistaken in earlier reporting on Israeli Prime Minister’s Benjamin Netanyahu’s acceptance of House Speaker John Boehner’s (R – Ohio) invitation to address a joint session of Congress in March. This, despite the fact that Boehner’s office released a detailed timeline two days earlier. The report played a central role in the widespread controversy that ensued about the propriety of Netanyahu’s acceptance of the invitation.

The original article reported that Netanyahu had explained why he accepted the invitation from Boehner “without first notifying the White House.”

The correction states that the White House had indeed been informed prior to Netanyahu’s acceptance.

Indeed, here is the correction in The Times:

Correction: January 30, 2015
An earlier version of this article misstated when Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel accepted Speaker John A. Boehner’s invitation to address Congress. He accepted after the administration had been informed of the invitation, not before.

American Thinker notes that the protocol followed in arranging Netanyahu’s speech this year is no different than protocol followed in 2011:

In 2011, Boehner sent a notice to the WH stating his intention to invite Netanyahu to speak before a joint session of Congress. The White House never responded (spite? incompetence?) and Boehner proceeded to extend the invitation to Netanyahu. Netanyahu accepted the invitation and spoke. The White House did not express any outrage in 2011.

[…]

Boehner clearly assumed the same series of events was occurring when the White House failed to respond this time to the notice given to the White House before he sent an invite to Netanyahu. (Hat Tip: CJL and LR).

However, the correction, and the fact that it completely undermines “speechgate,” has only been reported in some blogs, Jewish, Israeli or niche media.

Indeed, even after the correction, Times columnist Thomas Friedman continued to flog the false narrative.

Where are the journalistic ethics? Where’s the fact-based reporting? And, at the very least, when it comes to the correction of the record on the issue of Netanyahu’s upcoming speech… Where’s the coverage?

We expose the anti-Israel lies so you don't have to. But we can't do it without your help. Join the fight -- Donate now
Tell the World – Share Now!

More from SNAPSHOTS

  • American Lutheran In Jerusalem Affirms that IDF Soldiers Are “Stormtroopers,” Backtracks

    December 19, 2018

    Rev. Carrie Ballenger Smith is a pastor at the Church of the Redeemer in Jerusalem. She ministers to the English-speaking congregation that meets at the Lutheran church, which is located in the Old City of [...]

  • LA Times, Places Not Banned, and Inaccurate Terminology

    December 11, 2018

    Not on Trump's travel ban list: Egypt, Afghanistan, 'Palestine' At least eight times in the last 14 years, The Los Angeles Times has corrected the inaccurate use of the term "Palestine," but that fact did [...]

  • The Washington Post Ignores Antisemitic Attack in Los Angeles

    November 29, 2018

    The Washington Post has warned about a “rising tide of antisemitism.” But as CAMERA has highlighted, The Post’s coverage of antisemitism has frequently been selective and is often politicized. More recently, the newspaper even ignored [...]

  • Think Tank: Iran Was Closer to Building a Bomb Than Previously Thought

    November 23, 2018

    A Nov. 20, 2018 report by a Washington D.C.-based think tank, the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) argues that Iran’s illegal nuclear weapons program was “more advanced than Western intelligence agencies and the [...]

  • AFP Headline Casts Palestinian Assailant as Victim

    November 21, 2018

    Agence France Presse yesterday published a throwback headline, bringing us back to the period almost two years ago in which media outlets serially produced headlines which depicted Palestinian attackers as the victims. The wire agency's [...]

  • Founder of Women’s March Distances Herself from Linda Sarsour and Other Haters

    November 20, 2018

    Teresa Shook, founder of the Women's March, has asked Linda Sarsour and other haters to step down as co-chairs of the movement. In her

  • More Hypocrisy and Anti-Semitism From Linda Sarsour

    November 19, 2018

    In an earlier CAMERA exposé, we pointed out the self-serving allegiances and disgraceful hypocrisy of Linda Sarsour (of Women's March fame). We demonstrated how she poses as a universal activist who embraces all marginalized people [...]

  • New Yorker‘s Ostensible Accuracy on Gaza Fisherman

    November 19, 2018

    Nov. 20 Update: New Yorker Corrects on Gaza Fisherman's Death After severely tripping up in its Gaza coverage earlier this year, The New Yorker -- a publication ostensibly "known for its high standards" in fact-checking [...]

  • Small Steps: Improved NY Times Language on Target of Hamas Rockets

    November 15, 2018

    Earlier this week, we pointed out how a New York Times article about fighting between Israel and Hamas neglected to inform readers that Palestinian rockets were fired indiscriminately toward civilians in Israeli towns and cities. [...]

  • AP Avoids Calling Farrakhan Comments “Anti-Semitic”

    November 9, 2018

    For some mysterious reason, the Associated Press felt Louis Farrakhan's mutterings on international relations deserve close attention. "Louis Farrakhan, in Iran, warns Trump a Mideast war possible," a Associated Press headline announced, as if the [...]