Ha’aretz Errs on Facebook, Too
In May 2012, Ha’aretz publisher Amos Schocken boasted the launch of a “new era,” “our new, multi-platform digital subscriptions” with “seamless integration with social networks.”
Schocken spoke of “a significant enhancement of its online content, especially in English.” But make no mistake: While the quantity of the online content may have been enhanced, the accuracy was not.
Ha’aretz‘s Facebook page currently features the following item with the heading “Women of the Wall compromise and agree in principle to move from Jerusalem’s Old City to a new egalitarian space”:
The Women of the Wall will agree to a compromise which will remove their monthly prayer group from the Old City? Hardly. As the hyperlinked article explains, the compromise would mean that the prayer group would be held “on the other side of the Mughrabi Bridge.” In other words, according to the plan, the group would move southward along the Western Wall some 30 meters and pray in the area of Robinson’s Arch and the southern excavations, a site rich in archeological treasures and well within the Old City, as any visitor can plainly see.
But don’t take our word for it. Check out this Ha’aretz graphic, which was published along with an article by Nir Hasson’s about the potentially problematic aspect of placing a prayer platform in an archeological site:
In his 2012 letter to readers, Schocken maintained that “Haaretz has an important role to play . . . .in promoting greater understanding between Israel and the Jewish Diaspora.”
The Women of the Wall issue is of great concern for large numbers of Diaspora Jewry, many of whom have never visited Jerusalem and don’t have a clue where the Mugrabi Gate and Robinson’s Arch are in relation to the Kotel prayer plaza. When Ha’aretz’s Facebook page falsely states that the group is agreeing to exile outside of the Old City, how exactly is “greater understanding” achieved?
(Hat tip: Judge Dan)
Update: (7:24 AM EST) Shortly after CAMERA contacted an editor concerning the editor, the post was removed from Ha’aretz‘s Facebook timeline.
More from SNAPSHOTS
Professor John Quigley Falsely Condemns Israel and U.S. Support in His Syndicated Column
April 30, 2019
John B. Quigley In his widely distributed April syndicated opinion piece mainly about ISIS, the Islamist terrorist entity, John B. Quigley, an Ohio State University law professor, argues that claims of an imminent ISIS resurgence [...]
The New York Times’ Slow Reaction to Hamas Crackdown on Palestinian Protesters
April 4, 2019
The New York Times took a slight jab at Hamas, the terrorist organization that rules the Gaza Strip, in a recent story about Hamas's crackdown on Palestinian protesters who spoke out against its policies in [...]
CNN’s Zakaria Deals With U.S. Proclamation Recognizing Golan As Part Of Israel
April 3, 2019
Fareed Zakaria hosted an eight-minute discussion of the Golan matter at the end of his weekly (weekend) program, “Global Public Square “ (GPS) hour-long Cable News Network (CNN) broadcast. The broadcast, on both CNN and [...]
NY Times Reporter David Halbfinger Editorializes Israel as “Brutal”
March 6, 2019
New York Times Jerusalem bureau chief David Halbfinger Israel, according to the New York Times, is a brute. A March 3 news analysis piece—not an opinion piece—by the newspaper's Jerusalem bureau chief David Halbfinger uses [...]
Palestinian Malevolent Indoctrination Exposed; Mainstream Media Are Indifferent
February 26, 2019
Palestinian Media Watch (PMW), an Israel-based non-governmental organization, analyzes and presents in English to the world the ongoing inflammatory indoctrination of Palestinians in Arabic particularly via Palestinian Authority (PA) television (West Bank). PMW is a [...]
Did WCC Activists Attend A Birthday Party Promoted by Palestinian Extremist Organization?
February 4, 2019
The video is a bit fuzzy and grainy. But the footage of birthday party for Shadi Farar, a 12-year-old Palestinian boy who spent three years in an Israeli jail on charges of intent to murder, [...]