New York Times Repeats False Promises in Defense of Putin Op-Ed
In defense of his decision to publish a controversial Op-Ed by Russian president Vladimir Putin, New York Times editorial page editor Andrew Rosenthal made some high-minded claims about the newspaper’s supposedly non-judgmental and ideologically open Op-Ed pages. Those claims, however, don’t withstand scrutiny.
Although Rosenthal told the newspaper’s public editor that he doesn’t agree with many of the of the points in the Op-Ed, he goes on to insist that this is “irrelevant.”
“There is no ideological litmus test” for an Op-Ed article, he claimed.
Looking back at the newspaper’s track record, though, it’s clear that ideology does play a role in what is published and what is not.
Consider this: When Richard Goldstone, the head of a UN “fact finding mission” on the war between Hamas and Israel that began in December 2008, submitted an Op-Ed to the New York Times harshly criticizing Israel, the piece was accepted and placed in the September 17, 2009 edition of the newspaper.
A year and a half later, Goldstone approached the New York Times with a bombshell. He had repudiated the central and most slanderous finding of the anti-Israel United Nations report that bears his name, and sought to share this dramatic and important news in a new Op-Ed. But this time, the newspaper rejected his submission.
This decision to prominently highlight views that accord with the newspaper’s unsympathetic disposition toward Israel while shying away from more favorable conversation about the Jewish state fits a pattern.
CAMERA’s nine-month study of the New York Times Opinion section found a consistent bias in the newspaper’s selection of Op-Eds. As the study explains,
The newspaper’s editors have repeatedly proclaimed their commitment to presenting a diversity of opinion on the Op-Ed pages. Former Op-Ed editor David Shipley insisted that the newspaper tends to “look for articles that cover subjects and make arguments that have not been articulated elsewhere in the editorial space. If the editorial page, for example, has a forceful, long-held view on a certain topic, we are more inclined to publish an Op-Ed that disagrees with that view.” The current editorial page editor, Andrew Rosenthal, similarly asserted that editors “are not looking for people who agree with us all the time” and are aiming for “balance over time.”
But there was no balance about the Palestinian-Israeli conflict over the study’s entire time period — not in editorials, not in columns, and not in guest Op-Eds.
• Of 7 Op-Eds discussion the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, 4 were predominantly negative toward Israel and only 1 was positive.
• There were no Op-Eds negative toward the Palestinians, and 1 Op-Ed that was positive toward the Palestinians.
The Times is certainly entitled to publish an Op-Ed by Putin. But editors should not pretend that “there is no ideological litmus test” on the opinion pages. There is.
Below are two graphs from the study.
More from SNAPSHOTS
Memo to Martin Marty and Scott Appleby: You Got Played
January 22, 2015
Last week, in a piece about Christiane Amanpour’s misuse of the word “activist” when describing the Charlie Hebdo murderers, Snapshots highlighted how a book published in 1997, Islamic Activism and U.S. Foreign Policy, downplayed the [...]
In ’48 War, the Jews “Didn’t Want These People to Leave the Village”
January 22, 2015
Israeli-Arab town of Jisr az-Zarqa Alexander Galloway, a former UNRWA director in Jordan, famously said that the Arab world was not interested in solving the Palestinian refugee problem, but instead preferred to "keep it as [...]
For NY Times’ Overseas Readers, Paris Kosher Market Attack Just a “Claim”
January 21, 2015
Maybe Jews were killed at a Kosher Market. Maybe they were weren't. All we know that someone claims it happened. At least that's how The New York Times' International edition put it. The domestic edition, [...]
As Four Jews Buried, MSNBC’s Ayman Mohyeldin Redirects Back to Palestinians
January 18, 2015
As the four Jews slaughtered as they went about their pre-Shabbat kosher shopping in Paris were laid to rest in Jerusalem Tuesday, and questions about the future of European Jewry were hanging in the air, [...]
Where’s the Coverage? Only Woman Murdered at Charlie Hebdo Was “Definitely Killed Because She Was Jewish”
January 14, 2015
If you have seen any of the news reports of the terrorist attacks in Paris, you have witnessed the media bending over backwards not to call the attacks antisemitic, though even the president of France [...]