International Herald Tribune Doubles West Bank’s Jewish Population

By Published On: September 19, 2011

iht doubles settlements.jpgiht doubles settlements.jpg
International Herald Tribune sees Israeli settlements in double

The International Herald Tribune, published by the New York Times, today doubles the West Bank’s Jewish population. In an article about the upcoming Palestinian appeal to the United Nations, Neil MacFarquhar writes that since 1991 Palestinians

remain under occupation, the number of settlers in the West Bank has tripled to around 600,000, and they have far less freedom of movement in the territories ostensibly meant to become their state.

In fact, the West Bank’s Jewish population is approximately 300,000, half the figure that MacFarquhar cites. According to Israel’s Central Bureau of Statistics, 303,900 Jews lived in Judea and Samaria at the end of June 2010. According to B’Tselem, a watch group which opposes settlements, the West Bank’s Jewish population in 2009 stood at 297,009. According to the CBS, the West Bank Jewish population stood at 94,100 in 1991, meaning it did triple between then and now, but the total numbers are just half of what the IHT claims.

The New York Times, which also ran the MacFarquhar story, goes to press after the Tribune, and editors there apparently caught the erroneous figure — sort of. The Times version reads:

They remain under occupation, the number of Jewish settlers has tripled to around 600,000, and they have far less freedom of movement in the territories ostensibly meant to become their state.

By deleting the reference to the West Bank, the figure of 600,000 may also include Jews living in parts of Jerusalem annexed after the Six Day War. But do 300,00 Jews live in eastern Jerusalem? Not according to the CIA World Factbook (which puts the figure at 192,800) or B’Tselem (186,646). In other words, the combined Jewish presence in both the West Bank and eastern Jerusalem nears 500,000, 100,000 less than the New York Times claims.

But hey, in the context of the article told much from the Palestinian point of view (contending that negotiations “achieved little after 20 years.” ignoring the fact that Palestinians had several opportunities to achieve a state, and that their rejectionism began with rejection of the 1947 U.N. Partition Plan, citing the George Soros-funded International Crisis Group without any qualification, and more), what’s a little numerical padding here and there?

Oct. 6 Update: The Tribune corrects.

We expose the anti-Israel lies so you don't have to. But we can't do it without your help. Join the fight -- Donate now
Tell the World – Share Now!

More from SNAPSHOTS

  • The Palestinian Authority Paid Terrorists $347 Million in 2017

    January 9, 2018

    A Jerusalem Post graph illustrating how PA payments to terrorists are calculated, with amounts shown in shekels The Palestinian Authority (PA) paid imprisoned terrorists and their families 347 million USD in 2017, Israel’s defense ministry [...]

  • Foreign Policy Fails To Tell The Truth About UNRWA

    January 9, 2018

    An image posted on the official Facebook page of an UNRWA school As its headline illustrates, a Jan. 5, 2018 Foreign Policy article, “Nikki Haley’s Diplomacy of Revenge Targets U.N. Relief Agency,” substituted editorializing for [...]

  • Where’s the Coverage? Palestinian Leaders Spend Christmas Celebrating a Terrorist

    January 2, 2018

    PA President Mahmoud Abbas meets with Rafat Al-Jawabra on Dec. 25, 2017. Image courtesy of MEMRI Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinian Authority (PA) and head of the Fatah movement, spent Dec. 25, 2017 [...]

  • Newsweek Errs on Legality of Occupation

    January 2, 2018

    In a Dec. 28 article ("Israeli teens refuse to serve in military, take part in occupation"), Newsweek's Jack Moore errs, stating: The majority of the international community considers Israel’s occupation of the West Bank and [...]

  • Reuters Removes Photograph Implicating Israel in Deaths of Iranian Street Protesters

    January 2, 2018

    What do Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Israeli Transportation Minister Yisrael Katz have to do with the deaths of 10 Iranian protesters demonstrating against their regime? That's what Twitter users were wondering after Reuters [...]

  • ‘Crux’ of the Conflict, According to The New York Times

    December 24, 2017

    What is the crux of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict? According to a New York Times headline in yesterday's print edition, and online here, it is religious settlers encroaching on Palestinian land ("An Israeli Settler, A Dead [...]

  • Where’s the Coverage of New Jersey Imam’s Call for Genocide?

    December 21, 2017

    On December 8, MEMRI, the Middle East Media Research Institute, translated a sermon given in a New Jersey mosque. The organization summarized as follows: Sheikh Aymen Elkasaby, imam of the Islamic Center of Jersey City, [...]

  • DPA Captions Wrongly Blame Israel for Islamic Jihad Deaths

    December 13, 2017

    Deutsche Presse Agentur (DPA) published photo captions yesterday which incorrectly imply that an Israeli strike was responsible for the deaths of two Islamic Jihad members in Gaza. The photos and captions, distributed by major photo [...]

  • Reuters Rushes to Publicize Claim of “Israeli Attack.” You Won’t Believe What Happened Next

    December 12, 2017

    There may be times when "local residents" are good sources for a news story. But the death of two members of the Islamic Jihad terror group, killed in an explosion as they raced through Gaza [...]

  • What Were the Motives of the Port Authority Bomber?

    December 12, 2017

    What were the motives of Ayaked Ullah, the Port Authority bomber in yesterday's attack? There are many news headlines that address the issue, and they advance differing theories, each of them presented as fact. Thus, [...]