Not Covered: Hezbollah Weapons Cache Explosion
In July we noted that media outlets which obsessively cover Israel — such as the New York Times and Washington Post — failed to report on Hezbollah’s buildup of weapons in Lebanese civilian areas in violation of U.N. Resolution 1701.
It seems that not even a massive explosion Sept. 2 of one of these facilities — whose aftermath was caught on film — was enough to wake those journalists from their slumber. While some, such as the Associated Press and Boston Globe, did cover the explosion in the town of Al- Shahabiya, the leading national newspapers — the New York Times, Washington Post, and Los Angeles Times — did not.
All the news that’s fit to print? Make that “some of the news.”
A video of the evacuation of arms from the building, released by the Israeli army, is below:
More from SNAPSHOTS
CNN’s Amanpour Condemns “power grab” By Israel’s Prime Minister and Others
April 1, 2020
We’ve said it often, but it’s worth repeating: Anyone interested in reasonably unbiased information about Israel (at least) should avoid the broadcasts of CNN’s Chief International Correspondent and Anchor, Christiane Amanpour. In characterizing responses to [...]
Seattle Media Oblivious To Imam’s Hateful Indoctrination Condemning Jews
January 7, 2020
The Masjid Ar-Rahmah mosque teaching – that Allah transformed Jews into apes and pigs for disobeying him – delivered by Imam (prayer leader) Mohamad Joban – was posted online by mosque personnel. This December 2019 [...]
AP Distorts: Bethlehem ‘Almost Completely Surrounded’
December 10, 2019
Over two years after improving inaccurate language falsely citing Israel's security "barrier surrounding the biblical city" of Bethlehem, the Associated Press once again misrepresents. AP's Joseph Krauss and Mohammad Daraghmeh wrote yesterday ("Palestinians in Bethlehem [...]
Reuters Errs on Administrative Detention For ‘Anti-Israel Activity’
November 5, 2019
The Ofer Prison, near Ramallah (Photo by Tamar Sternthal) A Reuters article today egregiously misrepresents administrative detention, erroneously asserting that it is mainly applied to "Palestinians suspected of anti-Israeli activities," when in fact the Israeli [...]


