New York Times on Corrections
We at CAMERA are often asked what the point is of getting a correction published in a newspaper after the damage has already been done by the initial error. An October 2 column, “A Letter From the Editor: It All Goes on the Permanent Record” by New York Times Editorial Page Editor Gail Collins gives one good reason:
The most important motive for correcting the minor glitches is history. These days, everything we publish is stored not only in the Times archives and commercially available archives, but in the files of an army of search engines. We don’t want a college student of 2050 to come up with the wrong year for James Madison’s death because of our error – particularly not when we have the means to amend the record.
Collins further announces her intention to categorize the errors in two separate sections—one for corrections of trivial slips and the other for corrections of material errors.
The news section of the paper publishes this kind of corrections [misspellings, wrong dates, etc.] in a separate For-the-Record listing. That seems like a good idea – particularly because it makes it easier for readers to notice the other kind of corrections, which really make a difference. Those shouldn’t get lost amid the misspelled names and miscalculated dates. From now on, we’re going to use a similar system. A “For the Record” column of errata will run under the editorials whenever it’s appropriate. That seems like a good idea – particularly because it makes it easier for readers to notice the other kind of corrections, which really make a difference. Those shouldn’t get lost amid the misspelled names and miscalculated dates.
Still, despite the column’s somewhat self-congratulatory tone—”We correct all errors, from heart-stoppingly egregious to sublimely insignificant, because we believe that The Times should take its reputation for accuracy seriously”—the Times has been far from diligent in correcting editorial page errors. Read:
“The Worst of Times”
“New York Sun Hits Tom Friedman Distortions”
“More Times Tomfoolery“
More from SNAPSHOTS
Professor John Quigley Falsely Condemns Israel and U.S. Support in His Syndicated Column
April 30, 2019
John B. Quigley In his widely distributed April syndicated opinion piece mainly about ISIS, the Islamist terrorist entity, John B. Quigley, an Ohio State University law professor, argues that claims of an imminent ISIS resurgence [...]
The New York Times’ Slow Reaction to Hamas Crackdown on Palestinian Protesters
April 4, 2019
The New York Times took a slight jab at Hamas, the terrorist organization that rules the Gaza Strip, in a recent story about Hamas's crackdown on Palestinian protesters who spoke out against its policies in [...]
CNN’s Zakaria Deals With U.S. Proclamation Recognizing Golan As Part Of Israel
April 3, 2019
Fareed Zakaria hosted an eight-minute discussion of the Golan matter at the end of his weekly (weekend) program, “Global Public Square “ (GPS) hour-long Cable News Network (CNN) broadcast. The broadcast, on both CNN and [...]
NY Times Reporter David Halbfinger Editorializes Israel as “Brutal”
March 6, 2019
New York Times Jerusalem bureau chief David Halbfinger Israel, according to the New York Times, is a brute. A March 3 news analysis piece—not an opinion piece—by the newspaper's Jerusalem bureau chief David Halbfinger uses [...]
Palestinian Malevolent Indoctrination Exposed; Mainstream Media Are Indifferent
February 26, 2019
Palestinian Media Watch (PMW), an Israel-based non-governmental organization, analyzes and presents in English to the world the ongoing inflammatory indoctrination of Palestinians in Arabic particularly via Palestinian Authority (PA) television (West Bank). PMW is a [...]
Did WCC Activists Attend A Birthday Party Promoted by Palestinian Extremist Organization?
February 4, 2019
The video is a bit fuzzy and grainy. But the footage of birthday party for Shadi Farar, a 12-year-old Palestinian boy who spent three years in an Israeli jail on charges of intent to murder, [...]