In a Word, Bias
Sometimes, it requires no more than a word in a news story to achieve a favorable or unfavorable slant.
Consider the Associated Press’ choice of words when describing “collaborators” or “whistleblowers.” By definition, these two words have unfavorable and favorable connotations, respectively. The American Heritage Dictionary defines collaborator as follows:
2. To cooperate treasonably, as with an enemy occupation force in one’s country.
And whistleblower:
One who reveals wrongdoing within an organization to the public or to those in positions of authority …
It may come as no surprise, considering the AP’s history, how the wire service uses these words to editorialize in its coverage of Israel:
A May 15 dispatch states:
The Shin Bet has played a key role in Israel’s all-out campaign against Palestinian militants in more than four years of fighting, obtaining information from a network of Palestinian collaborators and by interrogating thousands of Palestinians rounded up in Israeli arrest sweeps.
On the other hand, hundreds of AP dispatches refer to Mordechai Vanunu as a whistleblower, for example:
Israel’s interior minister on Tuesday extended a travel ban on nuclear whistleblower Mordechai Vanunu for another year, officials said.
So the AP tells readers that Palestinian informants, individuals who tell the authorities about the activities and locations of terrorists planning to murder civilians, are acting “treasonably”;
whereas Vanunu, an individual convicted of treason and espionage for revealing sensitive state secrets and distributing photographs of an Israeli military installation, in violation of a country’s laws and an official contract he signed as condition of employement, is deemed by the AP to be a virtuous “One who reveals wrongdoing.”
Should it not be the other way around?
Furthermore, by using the word “whistleblower,” the AP also editorializes that Israel’s nuclear program is “wrongdoing” despite the fact that it is a legal program, like that of the United States.

The AP’s use of the word “moderate” — according to American Heritage, “Being within reasonable limits” — to describe the Labor Party is another example of improper editorializing.
More from SNAPSHOTS
Mahmoud Abbas’ Diatribe Threatening Israel Included Bogus Canaanite Claim
September 10, 2019
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas’ recent anti-Israel diatribe that aired on PA TV was monitored and translated by Palestinian Media Watch (PMW). Excerpt: "I say to [Israel]: Every stone you have built on our land [...]
CNN Calls House’s Unifying Anti-BDS Vote ‘Divisive’
July 24, 2019
Yesterday, in an overwhelming vote of bipartisan support, the House of Representatives voted 398 to 17 to adopt a resolution opposing the anti-Israel BDS (boycott, divest, sanctions) campaign. Yet, CNN's headline casts the unifying vote [...]
NY Times Cites Poll, Hides Palestinian Support for Violence
July 9, 2019
The New York Times has struggled to accurately describe polls this year. In January, editor Jonathan Weisman misrepresented Pew polling data to describe a nonexistent surge in Israeli support for the United States under President [...]
CNN’s Zakaria Indulges Palestinian Propagandist Hanan Ashrawi
June 9, 2019
Fareed Zakaria’s weekly Cable News Network (CNN) program (grandiosely named “Global Public Square”) June 9 broadcast included a discussion of the current U.S. Middle East peace plan with guests Hanan Ashrawi (Palestinian Authority official) and [...]
In Robert Bernstein Obit, AFP Inappropriately References His Judaism
May 29, 2019
Robert Bernstein (Courtesy the New Press) In its obituary yesterday for American publisher Robert Bernstein, Agence France Presse inserted an inappropriate reference to the Human Rights Watch founder who later turned on the organization due [...]


