« Where's the Coverage? Mainstream Media Ignore Bigoted Treatment of Israeli Olympic Team | Main | Distorted Quotes to Defend Distorted Maps »

August 01, 2012

Hosni Mubarak "Staunch Ally of Israel"


A report by Isabel Kershner and Elisabeth Bumiller discussing the controversial letter allegedly sent by newly-elected Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi to Israeli President Shimon Peres provides another example of how The New York Times' distorted view of Israel and the Middle East seeps into its news reporting.

Contrasting the tense relationship between Israel and Egypt's new Muslim Brotherhood political leadership, Kershner and Bumiller write,

Since the ouster of President Hosni Mubarak, a staunch ally of Israel, there has been no high-level dialogue between the Israeli and Egyptian political leadership...

A reality check is in order here. The former Egyptian president maintained the peace agreement with Israel and cooperated on isolating Hamas-ruled Gaza. For that he deserves praise. But a staunch ally? The New York Times has set the bar so low here it would challenge an expert limbo dancer. Under Mubarak's long rule, anti-Israel and anti-Jewish invective flourished in Egypt, including its state-controlled media. Economic relations stagnated and tourism was in one direction only — from Israel to Egypt. Mr. Mubarak himself set an example by never visiting Israel in an official capacity in 30 years as president. He visited Israel only once — a non-state visit — to attend Yitzhak Rabin's funeral.

With staunch allies like that, who needs tentative allies?

Posted by SS at August 1, 2012 03:49 PM


When it comes to the Middle East, the New York Times has been disconnected from reality for a long time.

Posted by: Phillip Feldman [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 2, 2012 12:15 PM

The NY Times simply makes up the story to serve its interests. I used to think it was journalistic laziness; just easier to print the fiction than the facts. After all the fiction is always more succinct and requires no actual outlay of energy. However, that's not it. They actually have an agenda and fit ALL "news" to it.

Posted by: Ksp48 at August 2, 2012 12:33 PM

The Times has been a joke for too long. I quit subscribing years ago. Go Thou and do likewise.

Posted by: art at August 2, 2012 04:22 PM

I parted with the New York Times a long time
ago. I would think many readers have caught on
to their bigoted agenda.

Posted by: Selma Soss at August 2, 2012 06:36 PM

Guidelines for posting

This is a moderated blog. We will not post comments that include racism, bigotry, threats, or factually inaccurate material.

Post a comment

Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)